Support

Explore

HomeNo Image is Available
About UsNo Image is Available
AuthorsNo Image is Available
TeamNo Image is Available
CareersNo Image is Available
InternshipNo Image is Available
Contact UsNo Image is Available
MethodologyNo Image is Available
Correction PolicyNo Image is Available
Non-Partnership PolicyNo Image is Available
Cookie PolicyNo Image is Available
Grievance RedressalNo Image is Available
Republishing GuidelinesNo Image is Available

Languages & Countries :






More about them

Fact CheckNo Image is Available
LawNo Image is Available
ExplainersNo Image is Available
NewsNo Image is Available
DecodeNo Image is Available
Media BuddhiNo Image is Available
Web StoriesNo Image is Available
BOOM ResearchNo Image is Available
BOOM LabsNo Image is Available
Deepfake TrackerNo Image is Available
VideosNo Image is Available

Support

Explore

HomeNo Image is Available
About UsNo Image is Available
AuthorsNo Image is Available
TeamNo Image is Available
CareersNo Image is Available
InternshipNo Image is Available
Contact UsNo Image is Available
MethodologyNo Image is Available
Correction PolicyNo Image is Available
Non-Partnership PolicyNo Image is Available
Cookie PolicyNo Image is Available
Grievance RedressalNo Image is Available
Republishing GuidelinesNo Image is Available

Languages & Countries :






More about them

Fact CheckNo Image is Available
LawNo Image is Available
ExplainersNo Image is Available
NewsNo Image is Available
DecodeNo Image is Available
Media BuddhiNo Image is Available
Web StoriesNo Image is Available
BOOM ResearchNo Image is Available
BOOM LabsNo Image is Available
Deepfake TrackerNo Image is Available
VideosNo Image is Available
Law

"Cannot Ban Media Reporting Oral Observations": SC To Election Commission

Media is a watchdog and it cannot be banned from reporting on oral observations made during court hearings.

By - Ritika Jain | 3 May 2021 12:35 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Monday observed that the media cannot be banned from reporting oral observations made during the course of court hearings. Sometimes the reportage of dialogue in courts is of "equal public interest", the SC said.

The top court's observations came while it was hearing on an appeal filed by the Election Commission of India against the Madras High Court's observations that the poll panel is "singularly responsible for the surge in COVID-19" and that it "should probably be booked for murder".

The apex court bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah further advised the poll panel to take comments made by the Madras High Court "in the right spirit".

"The High Court judges are overburdened, they're burning the midnight oil. They're only saying what they're seeing," Justice Chandrachud observed. "Sometimes the comments are harsh but we want to see in larger public interest something is done. After a series of orders, which may not be implemented, the HC may be anguished," Justice Shah added.

Media is the watchdog of society: SC

The election commission's plea to prevent the media from reporting oral observations made in court is "farfetched", the top court observed. The media cannot be banned from reporting oral observations, the bench added. Sometimes the dialogue between the bar and the bench is as important as the judgments, the court said.

Sometimes the discussions made in court are of equal public importance. The unfolding of the judicial process in court is important. The dialogue festers a sense of the court's application of mind, Justice Chandrachud said. The dialogues further bring in a sense of accountability for the judges and will foster citizens' confidence in the judicial process, he added.

High Court observations should be swallowed like a "bitter pill," Justice Shah said. "Your subsequent decisions after the (high court's) remarks have improved the system. Look at what happened in counting. You take it in the right spirit.. as a bitter pill", Justice Shah said.

"Often something is said due to past experience or after a series of orders not being adhered to. Everything cannot be in order," justice Shah added.

Following the sharp remarks made by the Madras High Court, the poll panel issued circulars and directed the implementation of COVID protocols during the recently concluded polls in four states and one union territory.

"We don't want to demoralize our High Courts, which are doing tremendous work during the COVID...We cannot tell the Judges that confine yourself to pleadings. They are burning the midnight oil, they are overwhelmed. They are also humans, they are seeing what is happening on the ground. It is bound to affect your psyche," Justice Chandrachud observed.

"We are looking at this from a long-term impact on the functioning of high courts. We don't want to demoralize our high courts. They are vital pillars of our democracy. Things are often said in an open dialogue between bar and bench," Justice Chandrachud added. "What I am saying is not to belittle the Election Commission, but democracy survives only when the faith in the institutions are strengthened.

The Supreme Court will pass detailed orders on this issue by Thursday.

Tags: