Support

Explore

HomeNo Image is Available
About UsNo Image is Available
AuthorsNo Image is Available
TeamNo Image is Available
CareersNo Image is Available
InternshipNo Image is Available
Contact UsNo Image is Available
MethodologyNo Image is Available
Correction PolicyNo Image is Available
Non-Partnership PolicyNo Image is Available
Cookie PolicyNo Image is Available
Grievance RedressalNo Image is Available
Republishing GuidelinesNo Image is Available

Languages & Countries :






More about them

Fact CheckNo Image is Available
LawNo Image is Available
ExplainersNo Image is Available
NewsNo Image is Available
DecodeNo Image is Available
Media BuddhiNo Image is Available
Web StoriesNo Image is Available
BOOM ResearchNo Image is Available
BOOM LabsNo Image is Available
Deepfake TrackerNo Image is Available
VideosNo Image is Available

Support

Explore

HomeNo Image is Available
About UsNo Image is Available
AuthorsNo Image is Available
TeamNo Image is Available
CareersNo Image is Available
InternshipNo Image is Available
Contact UsNo Image is Available
MethodologyNo Image is Available
Correction PolicyNo Image is Available
Non-Partnership PolicyNo Image is Available
Cookie PolicyNo Image is Available
Grievance RedressalNo Image is Available
Republishing GuidelinesNo Image is Available

Languages & Countries :






More about them

Fact CheckNo Image is Available
LawNo Image is Available
ExplainersNo Image is Available
NewsNo Image is Available
DecodeNo Image is Available
Media BuddhiNo Image is Available
Web StoriesNo Image is Available
BOOM ResearchNo Image is Available
BOOM LabsNo Image is Available
Deepfake TrackerNo Image is Available
VideosNo Image is Available
World

No, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was Not Confirmed As Judge In An Election Year

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated, confirmed and sworn in during 1993, which was not a federal election year in the US.

By - AFP | 26 Sept 2020 7:52 PM IST

Facebook posts shared thousands of times claim US Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated and confirmed within 43 days of an election. This is false; Ginsburg was nominated, confirmed and sworn in during 1993, which was not a federal election year in the US.


"Irony Are You Aware Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was Nominated And Confirmed With In 43 Days Of An Election? #FillTheSeat" reads a September 21, 2020 Facebook post.

The post does not mention which type of election it refers to, but it comes during a political maelstrom over the late Ginsburg's successor:  President Donald Trump wants a new justice confirmed before the November 3 presidential election, while Democrats -- seeking to unseat Trump -- want to wait until afterwards.


Screenshot of a Facebook post with a false claim taken on September 25, 2020

More examples of the claim are available on Facebook here, here and here.

Ginsburg, popularly known as RBG, died on September 18, 2020 after 27 years on the nation's highest court. She was nominated by president Bill Clinton on June 14, 1993 and confirmed by the Senate 50 days later, on August 3, 1993.

Also Read: No, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Did Not Advocate Lowering Age Of Consent To 12

Neither a midterm nor presidential election took place that year; elections for federal office take place in even-numbered years

Ginsburg's death 46 days before the presidential election offers Republicans a chance to lock in a conservative majority for decades to come on a court where justices are appointed for life.

The decision could affect landmark rulings on abortion, health care, gun control and gay rights. The stakes are even higher in an election year, as the justices could have the final word if there is a contested result. The court ruled to stop a recount of votes in Florida in 2000, giving George W Bush the presidency.

While Democrats' options seem limited, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer told party members on September 19 that if Republicans press ahead with Ginsburg's replacement, then "nothing is off the table." 

"This vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president," Schumer said the day before, carefully echoing the words of Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell in the 2016 election year, when he blocked Barack Obama's pick Merrick Garland.

But Republicans appear to have the Senate votes needed to push through a Trump nominee.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by BOOM staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Tags: